Education
in Illinois seemed to have taken a good turn with last summer's legislation to
change the funding formula to serve all of the state’s students, and especially
those from low income, or less advantaged communities. This light at the end of
a decades long tunnel, presaged by mistakes, missteps, and misalliances, seemed
to be the dawning of a new day, even as Governor Bruce Rauner, signed the bill,
passed over his veto, amidst the smiling faces of the schoolchildren that
surrounded him.
Originally
claiming that the bill first promulgated by State Senator Andy Manar, Democrat from Bunker Hill, was simply a
bailout for Chicago, and in a war of words, it seemed that a new day had dawned
when the state assembly bucked up, and said no.
Then
the recent turnabout -- perhaps a petulance at having been forced to sign the
bill that he hated, now came a regulation that there had to be a change in
terms to ensure that all got the same chance, and especially those that were
slated to receive monies from a $75 million scholarship that was a weak cover
for a voucher, and one that was promoted by Cardinal Blase Cupich of the
Chicago archdiocese, whose parochial schools were to benefit greatly.
While
the Chicago Teachers Union railed at the obvious duplicity, and the weakening
of the public school system, then in his fiscal year 2019 budget proposal
Rauner has set those monies to go down the pipeline of underfunded pensions, by
suggesting that school districts, not the state, pay for teachers pensions, but
with no dedicated funding stream, the schools would be forced to relinquish any
gains from last year’s legislation to make the payments.
As
the News-Gazette stated: “The key cost-cutting
provision in Rauner's budget is a plan to shift pension and group health
insurance costs — 25 percent this year, rising to 100 percent in four years —
off the state budget and onto individual universities, community colleges and
local school districts.”
Democrats
did not succumb to Rauner’s arguments when he said, "We need to move
pension costs to the people who do the buying, and make them responsible for
the paying, too.”
"This
is the biggest backdoor property tax increase in Illinois history," said
State Treasurer Mike Frerichs, a Champaign Democrat and a former state senator.
"He says he is increasing money for education and higher education, but at
the same time making them pay far more than they're going to get. I find it
galling for him to claim that he is fighting to cut taxes and put more money
into education while pushing further burdens on our schools and our property
taxpayers."
The
plan has its supporters, among them the editors of the
Belleville News Democrat who opined, “Rauner is right that school districts should be
responsible for their own pension costs. The current system separates
responsibility for paying a teacher's salary from paying most of a teacher's
pension costs.
That leads to inflated final salaries paid by districts encouraging teachers to retire in their 50s so they can bring in younger teachers and pay them less. Then the state pays the retired teacher an extra decade based on that higher salary plus another 4.4 percent bump if the teacher has two years of unused sick leave.”
That leads to inflated final salaries paid by districts encouraging teachers to retire in their 50s so they can bring in younger teachers and pay them less. Then the state pays the retired teacher an extra decade based on that higher salary plus another 4.4 percent bump if the teacher has two years of unused sick leave.”
Currently, 26 percent of the state budget is spent on group health and pension costs.
Economists,
and academics alike, in opposition, have sounded the alarm at the prospect,
with the most prominent being Ralph Martire, executive director of the esteemed
Center for Budget and Tax Accountability, whose distress can be seen, when he said in an
op-ed piece for the State-Journal Register, “. . . he proposes to save the
state money by shifting the obligation to pay the “normal costs” — that is, the
amount the employer has to pay to cover future benefits being earned by current
workers . . . which covers every school district except CPS, to local schools,
saving the state $262 million. He then suggests Chicago residents assume 100
percent of the normal cost for the Chicago Teachers Pension Fund, saving the
state another $228 million. Both proposals require legislative action, which
won’t happen.”
“It
won’t happen, because lawmakers don’t want to be blamed for forcing an increase
in local property taxes on their constituents, which is the inescapable
consequence of the governor’s cost-shift proposal. See, while shifting this
obligation saves $490 million in state revenue, it doesn’t save taxpayers a
nickel. It just compels their local property tax bills to cover the tab. Given
that Illinois already is more reliant on property taxes as a revenue source
than most other states generally, and is currently the most reliant state in
America on property taxes to fund schools specifically, the governor’s proposal
to shift these costs to property taxes is both poor policy and poor politics.
It won’t — and shouldn’t — happen,” concluded Martire.
Meanwhile
Chicago struggles to maintain a system weakened by scandal, in the form of its
last two superintendents, Barbara Byrd-Bennett who was convicted of bribery,
and the recently departed Forrest Claypool on an ethics violation, that he lied
to cover, and proposed closing three
schools, in the Englewood neighborhood, an African American stronghold that
has been plagued by disinvestment and violence, only to have new CEO Janice
Jackson, under pressure, reverse plans, and say that they would be phased in
over three years.
As a
point person for the now disgraced Claypool, Jackson had to face a barrage of
criticism from within and without the system, including gubernatorial
candidate, Chris Kennedy who said, that it was part of what he calls Mayor Rahm
Emanuel’s “strategic gentrification plan,” which has at its core, he says is a
plot to force African-Americans from the city, which they have done in droves,
creating a new phenomena in urban migration.
Laura
Washington, a black columnist for The Chicago Sun-Times, wrote that, “Chicago has
lost more than 177,000 black residents between 2000 and 2010, according to the
U.S. Census. [And] Cook County’s black population has fallen by more than
50,000 since 2010,” she added.
While
there were several shrieks, of outrage, in response, from many quarters, Kennedy’s claim, considering the historic
school closings by Mayor Emanuel, in majority black areas, in 2013, has the
ring of truth.
“I
believe that black people are being pushed out of Chicago intentionally by a
strategy that involves disinvestment in communities being implemented by the
city administration, and I believe Rahm Emanuel is the head of the city
administration and therefore needs to be held responsible for those outcomes,”
he concluded.
Since
chaos is not created in a vacuum, failures of this type, might not just be an
orphan, standing the age old adage on its head.
With
Chicago as the economic engine of the state, the proposal by Rauner, and the
actions by Emanuel, also force us to take a look back in time when one of the
endangered school, John Hope College Prep High School, in Englewood, was a
success by most standards, with a high graduation rate that had administrators
saying that they were definitely doing things right and felt no fear.
But
policies by then Mayor Richard M. Daley and CPS School CEO Arne Duncan, along
with a closing of nearby Englewood Academy, and acceptance of its students, and
the subsequent redesignation of Hope as a neighborhood high school brought
problems: loss of admission standards, plus violence and disciplinary issues,
noted Sarah Karp for local
NPR affiliate,WBEZ.
It
also brought competition: “Between 2005 and 2015, CPS opened nine high schools
within about two miles of Hope. . ..
many families were enticed by the prospect that the schools would offer
their children something better.”
.
Coupled
with population loss, and increasing violence, the degradation of a once fine
school, helped to shutter a thriving neighborhood.. It also shows how lawmakers
and school officials actions can have a deleterious effect on the disinvestment
of black and brown neighborhoods.
In a
dollars and cents breakdown, it also means, as Martire says, less money for
schools just when they are needed the most, but the $8.8 million backlog of
unpaid bills by the state from the recent year budget crisis means there can be
no additional money to the schools, with Rauner’s proposed plans.
With
all politics being local and with the upcoming March primary it seemed that
Rauner, was also trying to claim higher ground when in January, he took an amendatory veto to ensure that the
aforementioned $75 million dollar scholarship program, he quibbled over
terminology that he feels will delay the program for about three dozen private
schools.
According to the Chicago Tribune, “Rauner’s issue centers on language that would require nonpublic schools to be “recognized” by the board of education to participate in the tax program. He says that eligibility should be expanded to schools that are “registered” with the board.
According to the Chicago Tribune, “Rauner’s issue centers on language that would require nonpublic schools to be “recognized” by the board of education to participate in the tax program. He says that eligibility should be expanded to schools that are “registered” with the board.
Adding
more fuel was, “during the fall veto session, the General Assembly passed a
trailer bill (Senate Bill 444) making two technical changes dealing with how
Equalized Assessed Valuation (EAV) is calculated in the new school funding
formula. The trailer bill advanced so the modeling done by the Illinois State
Board of Education (ISBE) for the new formula matched up with the bill that was
passed by the General Assembly and signed by the Governor,” an unprecedented
move said Senate Republicans.
Reversing
direction to put the funding bill back on
track
was Manar who said, of a Senate override, that it, “helps to correct a poor
governing decision that so far has delayed execution of the new school funding
formula by nearly three months. I look forward to the House taking the same
course of action so that we can put this sorry situation is behind us and allow
the Illinois State Board of Education to move forward with its work. Schools
and communities all over the state are anxious for this to be ironed out once
and for all.”