All but lost for Bring Chicago Home referendum

Tuesday’s primary election for Chicago proved the probable death knell for the much heralded and championed Bring Chicago Home referendum, which would have imposed a tax increase on properties sold over $1.5 million, taxed at 0.6 percent on the first $999,999 of the sale price, 2 percent on the next $500,000, and 3 percent on the rest.

In what was a surprise to many in City Hall, as well as residents, voters defeated the proposal by a resounding “no” with voters by a 53.6 % vote and only 46.4% vote saying “yes”, this despite a publicized effort by Mayor Brandon Johnson, and supportive alder people such as Maria Hadden of the 49th Ward, and State Res. Kelly Cassidy, both Democrats.

As we have noted before opposition was fiercest by building owners and managers, and their group, Building Owners and  Managers Association of Chicago, mounted a vigorous campaign to first take the vote off the ballot, which they did with the cooperation of an appeals court, but when it reached the Illinois State Supreme Court they declined to hear it, saying that the Court could not interfere in the legislative process.

.

The supporters despite some intense retail politics, including door knocking all over the city, and Hadden and Cassidy appearing at the polls, along with other elected city and religious leaders, were on hand at polling places to answer questions; all to no avail.

What is known is that the Association did mount a full court press of its own to malign, say some, in their efforts to defeat the measure which would have generated $100 million to fight the ever increasing homeless population of Chicago, estimated at the last point in time count to be 700,000.

While in some quarters there was sympathy for the building owners, they never offered an alternative, and the specter of a property increase amongst all classes of real estate is an unwelcome alternative that few want to see.

Had the measure passed the burden would have fallen on commercial properties and few homeowners. In fact, it contained a tax cut that would have benefited most of them on properties sold between $1million with a cut to 0.6 percent on the first $999,999, of the sale price, and 2 percent on the rest.

As The Chicago Sun Times reported, “The lowest turnout in at least 80 years for a presidential primary would have appeared to favor the Chicago Teachers Union, the CTU-affiliated United Working Families and progressive unions that had proven their ability to turn out their own voters in a low-turnout election by electing Johnson last year,” and largely driving this recent effort, after previous failed attempts in the past.

“Ald. Carlos Ramirez-Rosa (35th), the mayor's former City Council floor leader, made no attempt to hide his disappointment”, added the Sun Times.

"This is not the result we wanted. We're gonna have to take a real hard look at what happened and figure out how to move forward from here," said Ramirez-Rosa, who was instrumental in getting the binding referendum through the City Council and on the ballot after years of failure.”

Also expressing disappointment, in their report, and a possible reason for defeat was, “Johnson’s First Deputy Chief of Staff Cristina Pacione-Zayas [who] addressed the referendum at the Northwest Side party of newly elected state Rep. Graciela Guzmán.”

“We’ll continue to work. The issue is not going away,” Pacione-Zayas said, attributing the results to the court battle over whether referendum votes would be counted, which could have caused potential confusion among mail-in voters.”

With over 95 % of the votes polled, supporters are hoping that the uncounted mail in votes, 100,000 can give them a “Hail Mary Pass”, but with that count not coming until early next week, at least, that hope might prove to be more of a wish than a hope,

The political loss for a Jonson supported initiative cannot be dismissed, although it’s early enough in his term to salvage defeat, but some who never wanted to see him in office, are smelling blood in the water as was noted by the report:

"Bad policy should be defeated, and voters saw that it was bad policy," said veteran political strategist Greg Goldner, who quarterbacked the campaign against the referendum.

"It can't build affordable housing. It can't solve homelessness. It can't provide mental health services. It can't solve the migrant crisis. It can't provide affordable housing for teachers and vets. It can't do all of those things for a revenue stream that has proven to be unpredictable," he added. In the end, Goldner said, voters agreed the referendum was "poorly constructed, poorly defined" and a "very cynical public policy initiative."

While Goldner’s remarks ignore the enormity of these problems faced in cities across the country, with “solution” being a relative term, nonetheless, his comments reflect a deep dissatisfaction with Johnson, especially by the local white business elite, who did not want, as noted before, another Black mayor, after the defeat of former Mayor Lori Lightfoot.

In a larger sense, the opposition to progressive politicians in Democratic led cities has surfaced as business communities nationwide have expressed what they feel is a “lurch to the left,” noted Richard Florida, a professor at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management, in a recent interview with Crain’s Chicago Business, who added that while some companies left some larger American cities such as Seattle, and others, “they were trying to make statements, and say . . . “Look, Chicago and New York and San Francisco are no longer as well governed. They have been captured by a liberal elite.”

He added that when some of those companies moved to Austin, Texas and Miami, Fla.,they found much of the same problems with poverty and homelessness.

It’s easy, as the old cliché stated, that the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence, but tracing a different trajectory, albeit progressive, also takes partnership, as well as a reality check.

Bring Chicago Home faces judicial hurdle

“Bring Chicago Home” advocates faced a hurdle in their efforts to increase the real estate transfer tax as a dedicated revenue stream to fight homelessness in the city, a long standing problem further exacerbated by the increase of over 182,000 migrants, mostly from Venezuela.

On Friday Cook County Circuit Judge Kathleen Burke invalidated the ballot referendum that was to appear on the March 19th Chicago primary ballot, in a ruling pending from a lawsuit against the Chicago Board of Elections that she labeled vague and unconstitutional, and was welcome news to those opposed to the proposal, namely the Building Owners and Managers Association of Chicago, the Chicago Apartment Association.

The proposed ordinance  had long faced opposition by these groups and others and the ruling now removed the question from the voters, but since the ballots have already been printed, any votes will not be counted.

While an appeal is expected by supporters, the dilemma of how to begin to solve a long standing problem hangs in the balance with 682,000 unhoused people, not counting the migrants, who are living on the streets, sheltering on CTA buses and El trains, and doubled up with others and family members or other places not designed for human habitation.

The $100 million dollars in expected revenue leaves supporters including Mayor Brandon Johnson, in a bind to solve the social dilemma.

As CBS News Chicago reported, “Specifically, the Bring Chicago Home proposal would create a tiered system for the real estate transfer tax for property sales in Chicago:

• The transfer tax for properties valued at less than $1 million would drop from 0.75% to 0.60%

.

• Properties sold for between $1 million and $1.5 million would pay a 2% transfer tax, nearly triple the current rate

.

• Properties sold for $1.5 million or more would pay a 3% transfer tax, four times the current rate.

Meanwhile those bringing the suit are elated, and according to THe Chicago Tribune: “In a statement Friday, BOMA Chicago Executive Director Farzin Parang said the group was “gratified” by the ruling, which “underscores the necessity of presenting policy questions to the public with fairness, detail, and transparency.”

“This referendum would be a backdoor property tax on all Chicagoans, and it is important that our elected officials not mislead voters otherwise,” Parang said.

Earlier he had also the The Chicago Sun-TImes, ““The way that they worded this question was just sort of politics and it was vague and it was trying to manipulate people into thinking that they were getting a tax cut when this is, functionally, a property tax increase on everybody," and, "We’re just gratified that the judge agreed with us.”

In a revealing statement, Parang also “said that, had the binding referendum remained on the ballot, Johnson and his allies would likely have won.”

The Times also gave a reality check on local politics when they opined, “That’s because the March 19 turnout is expected to be low, and the person the mayor assigned to quarterback the campaign — Emma Tai, former executive director of United Working Families, a group affiliated with the Chicago Teachers Union — marshaled field operations for Johnson’s winning mayoral campaign.”

Framed in terms of racial disparity the mayor said in November, in a statement to the Tribune, “"We know that homelessness is up since 2019, and that Black Chicagoans account for 69% of our city's unhoused population, and one in four Black students in the Chicago Public Schools, unfortunately, will experience homelessness at least once during their lives. Bring Chicago Home is an important measure that I believe will help rectify this wrong,"and furthermore, "My administration will continue our mission to support Chicago's unhoused, and I will remain resolute in my belief that housing is truly a human right."

In a long racially segregated city, race cuts deeply, but others have fought back from some of the same communities affected, and one in opposition was the Southland Black Chamber of Commerce, and according to the Tribune:

"I think they just assumed that since the $1 million price tag was put on there, this is a rich person's tax to help poor people,'' said Cornell Darden Jr., chairman of the Southland Black Chamber. "But we didn't see it that way."

He said, as others have noted, “ if property owners paid the increase, they would simply pass it on to renters.”

"It can help increase the problem of homelessness by raising rental prices," said Darden.”

It was evident that the opposition has planned, organized and funded a formidable opposition, and the Tribune also reported that. “The group’s website, “Protect Chicago Homes,” states that the decrease for lower-value sales is a distraction from the hike borne by other property owners. “With no plan for how to spend this New Property Tax, they’ll be coming after your house next” to adequately fund affordable housing developments.”

Supporters state that while there would be a dedicated revenue stream, the monies would be governed by an advisory board.

In a statement after Burke’s ruling, Baker called for the city to “sit down together to develop a real plan for better homelessness prevention and to further housing stability.”

Until then, he said, the group would continue its campaign to inform voters “how tax burdened Chicagoans are and the need for policy solutions that do not rely on real estate taxes.”

Critics charge that those opposed had years, (dating from the Lightfoot administration, when the plan was first broached and later abandoned, by the mayor, who then developed an alternative tiered tax cut plan of hers, but no revenues to help the homeless) to develop an alternative plan for discussion, but this was never done.

Hovering in the background, like a many headed hydra, there are reports of “Other opposition groups . . . . One is Keep Chicago Affordable, which appears to be an extension of the 501(c)(4) nonprofit group Chicago Forward. Both are led by Resolute Public Affairs. It has not yet raised or spent any money.”

A noted leading advocate is Ald. Maria Hadden of the 49th Ward told local media:

"These are the same companies raising your rents and deconverting your condos, displacing you and your family from our neighborhoods," she wrote in a statement. "Chicago voters should be furious."

While Hadden has led a group of 19 like minded alders, it is important to note that the effort has been led by the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless, but also the aforementioned SEIU Healthcare, United Working Families, Communities United, ONE Northside and the Jewish Council on Urban Affairs.  But, despite their collective effort they have had to face the powerful, and wealthy Chicago real estate owners, and, of course, a larger budget to fight with, plus political fire power, as Friday’s ruling has shown.

On March 6th an appellate court ruled that the referendum could stay on the ballot, overturning the appeal by the Building Owners and Manager's Association, with weeks to spare before the March 19 primary. In essence, Presiding Judge Raymond Mitchell said that his court's decision was to not interfere in the legislative process, stating specifically that "Courts do not, and cannot, interfere with the legislative process." BOMA has not made a decision as of this writing whether or not to appeal to the Illinois State Supreme Court. DG

10 March 2024 9:34 CDST

Chicago charter schools examined by school board

On Thursday the Chicago Board of Education voted on extensions for the city’s charter, selective enrollment, and magnet school contracts, and especially the 49 charter schools. Ahead of the vote protestors demonstrated with the familiar hand lettered placards asking that the Board preserve school choice.

The result of the vote was to extend the charter contracts between one and four years and not the usual, and expected 10 years, bringing questions from the heads of some of those schools, and some hand wringing on what has become a worrisome concern for the leadership of those schools.

In a larger sense the issue is a focus on privatization of the nation’s public schools which we have seen under the Trump Administration, when Betsy De Vos was the head of the Department of Education, bringing the issue to the forefront.

It will be tough sledding for charter leaders with the election of Brandon Johnson as mayor and his former roles as teacher and organizer for the Chicago Teachers Union, as they favor strengthening neighborhood schools, and the Board agreed in December with a resolution  to do just that.

It’s no secret that Chicago public schools, especially in low income neighborhoods, have been underfunded, and suffer from inadequate resources, aging physical plants, and often inexperienced teachers; but, with a student population that is predominately Black and Brown, in a city that has long suffered from racial segregation, the lack of political will by prior mayoral administrations has exacerbated those problems.

Notably the closing of over 50 schools in those neighborhoods by former Mayor Rahm Emanuel in 2013 did not help the perception that the city was disenfranchising Black students.

Caught in the middle, say some educators and parents groups, are lower income Black children whose neighborhood schools are felt to be inadequate. And, in a protest held the day before the Board met many of those parents were there to express their frustrations and fears, that they might lose their favored charter schools.

“How could we possibly eliminate a family's ability to choose the best school for their child?" Noble Schools CEO Constance Jones said. ""How can this board claim to support a quality public education when it is actively trying to get rid of schools exactly that, “ reported ABC7 News.

Of the total of 49 schools, most did receive 4 year contracts, with one receiving a one year contract, and the Board cited those on the shorter end, but overall needed to meet benchmark standards of special education, and students who are English language learners.

For the leadership of the Board a central concern is that the charters are essentially a private school system in a public system funded by public monies and should be held accountable to do the very best for students with taxpayer money.

Elizabeth Todd Breland, board vice president said at Thursday's meeting,“I still maintain that as a private operator getting public money, there should be a higher level of scrutiny,”

The areas of focus for them are academics, finances and operations, corresponding also to state and federal law, points which are not always held in the public arena. And, none of the schools met, or exceeded in those categories at this time.

The end result was that over half of those schools received a contract extension for four years, and forty percent for three years, and none got 5 years.

Taking a closer look at the numbers, we see claims that 75 percent of Chicago public school children are educated in charter schools, but there is also the dwindling population of school age children, especially in Black neighborhoods, due to out migration, has shown a corresponding reduction in student population; and, for some the question of evaluation, and contract extensions is critical, as it is with neighborhood schools. 

An ongoing debate is whether students do better in charter schools, socially, and academically, and a decades old media discussion showed that on standardized testing charter school Chicago students performed no better, or worse than public school students. While some objected to that, former Mayor Rahm Emanuel, was one.

The Washington Post, in 2014 coverage found that to be the case, but supporters now say that has changed in favor of the charters.

Diffen.com reported this:

“A 2013 study by Stanford University's Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) concluded about two-thirds of charter school students perform the same or worse than students in traditional public schools, while about a third of students perform better in a charter school setting. CREDO's director told NPR that African American and Latino students, as well as students whose first language is not English, experienced particularly impressive gains in performance while enrolled at charter schools. However, critics have countered that charter school policies like fines for misbehavior drive students from poor families to drop out. Charter schools also tend to have fewer accommodations for students with disabilities such as autism.”

It’s sure to be an ongoing debate, and both sides will undoubtedly be forced to examine their stances, but as of now, Chicago charter schools are under the microscope.

Chicago: The Midwest Epicenter of the Migrant Crisis

2.8 million migrants have come to the United States seeking asylum, mostly from Venezuela seeking freedom from political corruption, a ruptured economy, and financial extortion, and, reaching the border state of Texas, they have been used as political pawns by Gov. Greg Abbott, beginning in 2022 has bused them to Democratic strongholds such as New York City and Chicago, who earlier declared themselves sanctuary cities.

In moves calculated to get the maximum bang for their political buck, the optics are strong, and a target was the much maligned Vice President Kamala Harris, who has seen busloads dropped off in front of the gates of her home in Washington, DC.

As we have noted before the asylum seekers have made dangerous journeys from their homelands facing robbery, and extortion from those purporting to help them, only to make them even more vulnerable; and, many of them are women with children, some in various stages of pregnancy with little more than the clothes on their back.

Deliberately not coordinating with the aforementioned cities, Abbott has seemingly enjoyed the ensuing panic in Northern cities to find them shelter, food, and clothing, (especially for the coming winter months), and also the firestorm of resistance among many Americans.

Growing Resistance

This summer residents of the Edgewater neighborhood of Chicago fought hard, but to no avail, to prevent the Broadway Armory being used as a migrant shelter, and in Brighton Park, another neighborhood seemingly destined for a winterized base camp to house them, residents attacked Ald. Julia Ramirez, and the ensuing melee sent her assistant to a local hospital for injuries.

These and other incidents across the country, have created another political and social rupture to an already divided country;  and, taking sides against the migrant arrivals has become increasingly prevalent, and also a high degree of ignorance, with some seeing asylum seekers as illegal immigrants, and not through the legalized system of admission that the United States has created.

Irony also abounds as some of the most vocal opponents have family members that have been, or are recent migrants, and in some cases, illegal immigrants from some South American countries. And, while the political landscape has become a minefield of issues, this one is threatening to the social fabric of many major American cities.

Republicans are markedly singling out President Biden as responsible for the increase in migration and not the political and economic battles that have ensnared Venezuela.

For many Americans the role of the presidency is misunderstood,and they forget that in America we have the rule of law; and that Biden is not an autocrat, and Congress is the lawmaking body with duly elected representatives.

A primer on immigration in the U.S.

Efforts at regulating immigration began shortly after our independence from Great Britain, and have waxed and waned with the first laws imposing “limits that favored Europeans” as the Pew Research Center has noted.

In 1965 a law was passed, expansionist in scope, that “opened doors to immigrants from other parts of the world. In more recent years, laws and presidential actions have been shaped by concerns about refugees, unauthorized immigration and terrorism.” 

Looking back we see that in 1790 a naturalization law limited those who could become a citizen to free whites, of the ill defined “good moral character,” and who had lived in the country for at least two years. And, it was not until 1870 that the right was “extended to those of African origin.”

For the Chinese, a law was passed in 1943 to give them limited access, and in 1952 race was eliminated as a reason for exclusion.

In 1965 the Immigration and Nationality Act favored skilled immigrants and family reunification rather than a country quota, and in 1986, the Immigration Reform and Control Act legalized “millions of unauthorized immigrants, mainly from Latin America, who met certain conditions.”

Since that time Congress has failed to pass comprehensive immigration law and new rules for asylum seekers, bringing us to this current juncture.

Seeking shelter

Affordable housing is at a premium for most of the nation, but especially in New York and Chicago, and proposals for even temporary shelters in unused buildings across the latter have resulted in angry public meetings, such as those in Edgewater and Brighton Park, but also hinges on long histories of racial segregation against Black and Brown people, versus Northern European whites. As one wag told us, “this would not happen if the immigrants were from Sweden.”

Current figures show that since August of 2022, there are 8,367 migrants living in city shelters, and nearly 3,000 are sleeping on the floors of police stations, often whole families, with limited access to bathroom facilities, food and water.  There are also 12,251 migrants living in shelters, plus another 2,175 staying at O'Hare and Midway airports.

City officials are struggling with the daily arrivals and coordination has been fraught to provide adequate coordination of efforts, and volunteers are burnt out trying to meet the needs of even adequate nutrition, to name but one need.

In their frantic efforts,Chicago seems to have been ripped off by vendors providing security, case workers, janitors and others. In a recent investigative report by The Chicago Tribune,they described a security guard working 56 days in a row, 12 hours a day.

He is employed by Favorite Healthcare Staffing, a national employment firm, the lead contactor for these services, with pay rates of $60 to $150 an hour; and records show that hundreds of these workers “logged 84 hour work weeks with the overtime, paid at a 50% premium, helping ballon bills that topped at least $56 million.”

Perhaps out of embarrassment, the city has not released most invoices and media and volunteers are not allowed into the shelters, but the Tribune said that “the $56 million billed by Favorite Staffing from September 2022 through June 2022, reflected roughly two thirds of all funds the city spent on all migrant services.”

While the hours logged are questionable, the conditions of the facilities are less than optimal, say some, and others feel that the company is bleeding both the city coffers as well as burdening the staff, to gain more revenue, and Ald. Maria Hadden has noted that audits need to be done to monitor expenses.

Ald. Brendan Reilly whose downtown ward houses a former hotel, the Inn of Chicago, which is now the city’s largest shelter, told the Tribune that the charges were “insanity” and added, “The conditions that exist there are deplorable,” saying he has also had reports of intoxication, drug sales and prostitution outside the shelter doors.

Brandon Johnson, already under the microscope as the city’s third Black mayor, shortly after his election, has had to face down a number of his most ardent critics, first on increased crime, and now on his handling of the migrant crisis.

In September he inked a new contract with GardaWorld Federal Services to put up winterized tents or “yurt” base camps to deal with the nearly daily arrival of buses of migrants.

Brighton Park residents once again, voiced their opposition to migrants being housed in their neighborhood, this time at a standing room only meeting this past week; and, most were in an ugly mood, but there were some that questioned the wisdom of building the tents on land previously used for industrialisation, citing safety and environmental concerns.

Weeks later the mayor's office announced that there was a series of assessments carried out by an independent environmental group, yet there has still been opposition, and some confusion since construction has begun, but the final reports on any toxic materials left by the prior use of the site, will not be release until a week later.

This has prompted concern by some neighborhood representatives question the wisdom of the timeline, but also the fears that there will be thousands to be housed at the site in the future citing lack of transparency from the Johnson administration in previous discussions, and actions. They also say that the city has not done due diligence.

Critics have noted that these concerns are really objections to the tents couched in the language of concern. And, in an 111th hour reprieve by the Illinois state government and statements from Gov. J.B. Pritzker, they have now squashed the tents as being built, due to environmental concerns about dangerously high levels of mercury by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, and voiding the $91,400 monthly lease, which was to have been funded by the state, but operated by the city.

While the city did have its own its own environmental study, Pritzker said that they "do not satisfy IEPA standards," and had earlier said that, "we're stepping in here to try to help accelerate the process. It is not moving fast enough." adding "that is why you are seeing people still on the street, and we just can't have people on the streets."

This is still the case and Friday's announcement that 350 migrant families would be housed in the previously shuttered St. Bartholomew's Catholic school in the Portage Park neighborhood has elected mostly positive reactions among neighborhood residents, but some have cautioned that they hope that the Archdiocese of Chicago does not gouge the city coffers.

In Brighton Park most, however, feared crime, and decreased property values,and perhaps presaging objections, the city has said there would be no single men, only families, to assuage resident those fears.

With a mixture of various Latino citizens, and some Asians, these fears were met head on, and local media reported that one person, Ada Zhu, reading from a script, said that Johnson’s actions, “clearly showed the mayor’s disrespect for our district. You are taking our rights away. This is not right.”

Protestors then tried to block the entrance to the construction site for builder assessment and one woman received a minor injury in the melee, and police had to be called in those early morning hours to clear them away.

City deputy mayor for immigrant, migrant, and refugee rights, Beatriz Ponce de Leon has said, “This is not a Chicago issue, This is a national issue,” but you would not know it from resident ire, with its potent mix of xenophobia, as well as racism.

Not all is rosy with Portage Park residents and as nbcchicago.com reported on their website, Friday:

"Outside of the former St. Bartholomew Catholic School in Portage Park, a group of residents and community members shared their concerns and complaints with city leadership, now that the building could be slated to become a temporary migrant shelter. “They have no clue what they are doing,” said Patrick Gibbons. “They have to take care of their own people before they take care of anyone on the outside.” Residents said a lack of safety is their main issue with the plan. “I really don’t feel safe with any new strangers walking around the neighborhood,” said Wally Prusko, a longtime resident. “I wish things wouldn’t go in this direction and I hope things can worked out.” People want to see the school used for children in the community or to help house some of Chicago’s homeless residents, but that likely won’t be the case."

This and other planned efforts is a planned partnership between the archdiocese and the city of Chicago.

As the winter cold approaches, there is concern on both sides for the safety and well being of the migrants, but with many residents refusing to house them in their neighborhoods, the dilemma is apparent.

The local NBC News affiliate interviewed volunteer Lydia Wong who said, "We have significant fears of things like frostbite [and] hypothermia," and added speaking of the migrants, "People here aren't used to the cold at all."

Racial Conflict

Race is never far from the surface in Chicago, and its Black residents, many from long disinvested and disenfranchised communities on the West and South sides, are up in arms at any proposals to house migrants in their areas.

Misinformation is rampant, and one elderly Black woman told us that the migrants, “are getting $7,000 a month and we get nothing.” And, a middle aged Black man said, falsely, “Last week the mayor went to Washington to get more money for the migrants and that shows me who he is,” and uttered an expletive. Johnson is scheduled to meet with White House officials, and possibly Biden, in early November.

At that meeting Johnson was joined by the mayors of Los Angeles and Denver, and Eric Adams, the mayor of New York who had to return to his city for an internal emergency.

Meeting with White House senior staff, they practically begged for more money for housing and care of the migrants, far beyond the $1.4 billion that Biden has asked Congress for. and most importantly, "accelerated approval of work authorization and a more coordinated entry process for migrants," reported Cbsnews.com.

Johnson told reporters that "The 40 million that it's costing the city of Chicago every single month to provide care for those individuals who are seeking asylum, that is not sustainable."

Current monies spent are $270,000 for the Park District, $1.4 million for Chicago Public Schools, and $15.8 million for the Cook County Health System, resulting in a funding gap between $158 to $201 million.

.

Annette Guzman, Budget Director for the city of Chicago all but admitted in an interview with Fran Spielman of the Chicago Sun Times that there was no plan B if the Federal Government did not provide more money for migrant aid. The only other source, absent that, would be a property tax increase.

Last week Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker announced that the state will give $160 million to address what he called were the "bottlenecks" in the "pipeline" of housing the asylum seekers, plus $65 million for case management and legal services.

Long simmering resentments between Black and Brown residents have bubbled to the surface with the arrivals of migrants, and perception has bumped against reality.

Much of that reality has been that historic disinvestment in Black neighborhoods, but also they have lost the anchor of many of their neighborhoods, schools when the Rahm Emmanuel administration closed nearly 50 of them.

Local ABC affiliate included this in their earlier coverage of a public demonstration:

"For them to be sympathetic to their needs, saying it's a humanitarian issue crisis when Black people have had a humanitarian crisis for housing, employment and everything else," community organizer Jessica Jackson said. "How do we get pushed to the back?"

"We are taxpayers. We are property owners," Jackson [also] said. "Our money should be going to our communities, not supporting people who haven't put a dime into our communities."

To note, as of that date, a month ago, the coverage said: “According to data analyzed by the ABC7 I-Team, there are more than 20 active migrant shelters across the city, seven of which are located on the South and West sides.”

In a statement, the mayor’s office said in response: “"We are committed to continued investment for all residents, but especially communities on the South and West sides that have long experienced disinvestment. We are the City of Chicago, and our shoulders are big enough to support both new arrivals and those who have long called this city home."

Tensions are reaching a fever pitch between newly arrived migrants and longtime immigrant and minority communities over perceptions of unfair distribution of government benefits.

The Hill recently reported that, “as new arrivals become eligible for work permits, and in many communities of color, spending on shelter for asylum-seekers is viewed in contrast to scarcity in other social programs.”

“Mixed-status families, people who have lived here for 10, 20, 25, 30 years, who have been working, paying taxes, sending money back to Mexico, abiding by the laws, laying low — probably being better citizens than most Americans — are frustrated,” said Illinois Rep. Jesús “Chuy” García (D)."

Linking urban violence with with perceived threats of lawless asylum seekers has also created tension and further division, and each time one commits a crime, all migrants are seen as community threats.

García, in his interview with The Hill, also discussed that other refugees were much more easily assimilated, and said:“We’ve been able to, in Chicagoland, integrate about 30,000 Ukrainian immigrants who came to Chicago, and they did not get this much reporting over that period, much less stories about crime and drugs and prostitution.”

Absent from his remarks is that the Venezuelan asylum seekers are people of color and the Ukrainians are white.

Challenges to cultural assimilation 

These efforts are not going to go away quickly, say most observers, and concerned residents are worried about cultural assimilation, as well as educating and supporting students; and, this has become a huge challenge with only 5 percent of area social workers speaking Spanish, forcing some students trying to harness learning by using Google Translate on their phones.

To make matters worse there was a physical altercation in early October when two Venezuelan migrant teens were attacked with a baseball bat after school, resulting in broken ribs, a black eye, and kicks according to local media reports.

The fight was with students from Afghanistan, and after initially being thought of as a hate crime, Hadden, their alderperson, said it was “over cultural differences” and that the Venezuelan parents thought that it was because of their immigration status, and went to the media instead of talking to Sullivan school officials.

She also said, in her statement, “The school is adept at helping newly arrived students adjust to their new home and culture, but it’s not a process without conflict.”

Indeed citywide conflict in Chicago seems to be the norm, as migrants arrive in droves each day.

Updated 8 December, 2023 at 11:18 p.m.. CSDT.