Saturday, September 14, 2019

NEIU hosts Sean Spicer with protests and culture clashes


It’s been some time since we witnessed a college protest, and that was when we were  a protester during the Vietnam War so imagine our middle-aged chagrin as we approached the Northeastern Illinois University campus, on Thursday night, to cover the Daniel L Goodwin Distinguished Lecture Series with longtime political strategist Donna Brazile, and former White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, in what was bound to be a lively discussion, but had forgotten the deafening sounds of bull-horns, and rhyming protest chants.

The request for an escort, to the box office, across the floor, blocked by protesters, was given to a buff looking male with a walkie-talkie, to get our press pass, proved fruitless as we were told with a raised eyebrow, “You’ll just have to force your way through.”

Realizing that this was going to be challenging, but in the name of a free press, we tried, with a litany of “so sorry”, “excuse me” past a megaphone toting woman, leading the group in a loud chant of, “Hey, hey, here, here, Sean Spicer is not welcome here!”, while scampering past the auditorium doors, where the Plexiglas barrier of the box office made conversation impossible..

Finally, after some yelling of our own, we were escorted through the kind efforts of two fierce looking athletic males (with their own walkie-talkies), to the press section, and immediately heard Spicer angrily confronting Phil Ponce, host of WTTW's Chicago Tonight, who was the moderator of this sixth installment of the Goodwin series.

That was not the beginning, or even end of the protest drama, and we missed, but later learned that a male protester disrupted Ponce’s introduction rushed the stage, yelling “Shut it down!”, but was quickly tackled and dragged away by security guards, as he shouted, “I am a student here and all of you here are “f----g Nazis, you guys are hurting me!”

Ponce later quipped, “No one said that Democracy was easy!” and also added, “I hear that shouting outside, and that’s a sign of health, and we have an opportunity to have a robust and civil discussion.”

Spicer his voice near screaming, railed against Ponce, who tried for cover, over screeching accusations by the former press secretary, of “you” and “you people”, as he screeched his defense of President Trump, and the biased media:  “You all said, when he first came in, “How do we get this guy?” responding to Ponce’s question about the accuracy of some of his early statements.

As Ponce, stammering, struggled to regain his composure, and counter that some of Spicer’s earliest comments were indeed untruths, “for example the size of the crowds at the Inauguration, where you said, “It was "the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration, period, both in person and around the globe."

Spicer then retreated from the quote, and instead gave an explanation, that in his inimitable style, was that the real problem was of regret saying, as he had publicly noted before, but that it was still the “greatest experience to witness seeing such a large crowd.”

In an interview with NPR in July of 2018, Spicer said, “If you ask me for one thing that I probably want a do-over on, that's it. There was nobody happy with me that night.”

That might have been an understatement that night as, someone, three rows ahead of us, shouted “liar”, where he was promptly shushed by an elderly woman, only to have someone else, on the other side of the auditorium make the same accusation.

Then a second man appeared, and scrambled onto the stage, saying, “Spicer invited me! And sat cross-legged on the side, until Brazile nudged Ponce, who said, ‘Sir, you have to leave,” and was then hustled off stage, by security.

Earlier, CampusReform.org reported that “Moments after Spicer walked out on stage, someone is heard shouting "Spicer, you f*cking scumbag, kill yourself" and "you piece of shit!"

There was some questions of accuracy, but later that person identified himself, to me, saying he said “douche bag” to be exact.

Semantics aside, and oddly enough, after all of the shouts, screams, and the quirky defense of his statements about the inaugural crowd size, Spicer denounced Hillary Clinton, “that nobody liked,” giving some listeners the feeling that he was back in the White House press room before a slew of reporters.

Ponce then pointedly asked him about the charges that many people have made, questioning whether Trump is mentally incompetent, mentioning the diagnosis of narcissism, according to the criteria of the DSM, the Diagnostic Statistics Manual, used by psychologists, counselors, and social workers; and, to which Spicer replied, “that is a silly question, how could you even ask that based on some medical journal?”

The anger that the protesters fed from, that has given pause to some in the media who have said that the upcoming 2020 election is less about issues, and more about the person-hood of Trump and his dramatic altering of what a 21st century American democracy looks like.

Appearances, aside the evening billed as “Politics, the Press, and the Presidential Election,” the question of campus speeches from conservatives was also a topic, with Spicer noting that in his college years, “I don’t ever remember a conservative speaker.”

Some have wondered, aloud, what does being a conservative mean, now?

Debated for several decades, the greater contrast between political labels, remains to be firmly seen, but taking a rear-view glance, in attempting a definition, the ball has shifted from such old-school examples of Henry Cabot Lodge, or a Douglas Dillon, to those who have altered the course, and entered the presidency, such  by Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush; all of whom, in their administrations, skewed prevailing conservative ideas about fiscal, and legislative solutions to social issues, that earlier conservatives espoused, albeit with limitations.

The protests themselves, that night, reflected the shift, and in the materials that we received, there were these excerpts, in reaction to violence that has been triggered by the president’s remarks, in incidents both here, and abroad.

“"We see the policies and rhetoric of the Trump administration—including the role Spicer took early in this administration—as drivers of this violence," protest organizers wrote on the Facebook event page for the Rally to Stop Sean Spicer at NEIU. . . .The role Spicer played—and that the Trump administration continues to play—in this violence is one of creating space for these acts to occur."

“Spicer has consistently promoted policies like the Muslim ban, a border wall, family separation, mass deportations, banning trans people from serving in the military, and many other policies that have encouraged the violence that is taking over our world,” quoted Reason.com.

Ponce in advance, on WTTW, emphasized “The appearance at NEIU by Sean Spicer and Donna Brazile underscores key roles of a university – to expose students to different points of view, to acknowledge the right to protest, and to generate discussions about pressing matters in society,” Ponce told WTTW News. “All of us can benefit from robust and civil conversations on the current state of politics, the press and the future of the presidency.”

Perhaps so, but with a diverse student body of Muslims, Jews, and other ethnic minorities, and a location in a known neighborhood of immigrants, working class students, and with institutional credentials that NEIU has received “a federally designated Hispanic-Serving Institution, [that] is consistently recognized as a national leader among its peers,” the invitation seems to be contradictory to established university values, some said, or others, more candidly, told us, later, that the Spicer invitation is “a slap in our faces.”

With the focus on Spicer, and only much later Brazile, he was asked about the veracity of many of his statements, he noted that defending unpopular statements, was his job, and “not to call the balls”, and added the role of the White House press secretary “is a hard job.”

He also disavowed that he had once kept The New York Times, CNN and Politico out of the press room, saying instead that he had held a private meeting, and that it was not open to the press, saying, “I have a right to hold a private meeting!”

Brazile, on the other hand, when she could get a word in,  tried to jolly up the crowd with some folksy, “down home” humor, and jokes about “cussing folks out,” but, at times, seemed to wander about to find her position, and, whether it was earth mother, political expert, with a past, or simply to make everyone feel good.

She was not without a measure of success, as she parried, and laughed, and cracked jokes, but attempted to bridge the chasm, by saying, as “press secretary if they tell you that the sky is blue, and it’s not, it’s blue.”

Brazile also took a few swipes, with scattered references to being badly portrayed by the media, and for journalists, “that don’t do their homework,'' as Ponce asked his first question, playfully saying, “I know that you have the answer, as I submitted the question to your first, referring to her departure from the DNC for leaking a question to Hillary Clinton in a presidential debate, because, as she later explained, she didn't want her to be “blindsided” by the question.

Much like her later revelation to FOX TV personality Tucker Carlson, where she now also works, she claims that she also gave questions, at that time in 2016, to Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley.

There were a few titters from the audience, with Ponce's teasing, but Brazile did not seem to be amused by his humor.

She also took a swipe, in equal measure, at the polls and how they inform party politics, and how “misleading” but also that they need facts, not “bullshit”, and journalists that don’t do their homework, prompting some applause.

In what might have been seen as a way to spread the pain of the loss to Trump, by Clinton, Brazile noted the strategic loss of “bumper stickers and buttons” to key battleground states like Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin, by the DNC, and that without “voter expansion” by the Democrats, Trump could be reelected.

This very urban audience seemed to be underwhelmed by Brazile’s notice that the DNC needed to pay attention to rural areas, something that the Trump campaign has focused on heavily.

Taking the offense she also focused on her controversial remarks, last month on Fox Radio’s “Guy Benson” show about Trump’s rhetoric and its link to mass murderers, and the many negative comments engendered from the president’s many critics.

 "The reason why is to point fingers and to play this so-called blame game. President Trump had nothing to do with the maniac, and I’m being gracious here, the maniac who shot up a Wal-Mart store. He had nothing to do with the person who shot up, you know, the bar in Dayton. This is unbecoming of the country. The President of United States, you know, should not be blamed for you know these individual killers."

She then supported other remarks made at the same time, echoing Candidate Obama, that “we are all Americans” and that she is sick of all of these references to race, that bought huge applause, intended to support her assertion or not.

Many in the audience were expecting a prediction, of sorts, on who could beat Trump and she noted that with Kamala Harris and Corey Booker “stalling” it seemed that Joe Biden was the one leading candidate expected to win the nomination.

NEIU’s Goodwin lecture series may never have this many fireworks again, but in an age where opinions, and those who make them, are not receding, democracy is indeed at work.


Tuesday, September 3, 2019

Lightfoot sets the blueprint for fiscal reform


Last week Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot gave a state of the city address, that surprised some by its brevity, but as many are noting this has become her signature style: keep the message simple, and involve residents with a true desire for their input, much as her nocturnal visits to some of Chicago’s worst crime ridden neighborhoods, when she first took office dented those who underestimated her determination to tackle crime.

The position, she made front and center, was not new to most Chicagoans, and lawmakers, but the figure, the central figure of an $838 million deficit, put the shilly shallying aside about the more wonky details of urban economics that local alliances, and misalliances have noted.

The most notable aspect of her speech, coming on the edge of the Labor Day holiday, was that she would risk her political life on dealing with the deficit; for, as many journalists and economists have noted: nothing can be done in the city without money to feed that beast and move on to tackling the most challenging “to-do” list for a recent urban mayor.

“We have some hard choices to make. There is no doubt about that and I will not sugarcoat that reality. But I am confident, with the incredible talent in this city, working together we can make the necessary choices that will put us on sound fiscal footing not just for today, but for the future.”

Already, she has critics nipping at her heels ---- most notably with Tuesday’s first day of school for Chicago Public Schools, and a teachers union that has shown her no love, when their endorsed candidate, Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle was defeated by  her.

While Lightfoot scours every corner of the city budget looking for ways to save money, the Chicago Teachers Union has rebutted the offer of a 16 percent pay raise over five years, and President Jesse Sharkey has been saber rattling, to make it all the more difficult for her, as she tries to row a boat that has had poor captains for decades.

The teachers could strike as early as October, and that is sure to garner unwanted headlines.

The city's homelessness problem has increased, twofold, with the city’s “el” train system as the place of repose for over 80,000, in a point of time study, by The Chicago Coalition for the Homeless, with 80 percent doubled in other people’s homes, and the rest on the street, or, on the all night trains and buses.

Just outside the Harold Washington Library where Lightfoot made her speech, the Chicago Tribune reported that protesters “Carrying signs reading “Lori Lightfoot’s Broken Promise” in the style of her “Bring in the Light” mayoral campaign logo, homeless advocates criticized her for not living up to a pledge to fund affordable housing. Others urged her to cut off funding for the controversial taxpayer subsidy for the proposed Lincoln Yards development.”

Lightfoot was not specific on how she would address the deficit, but did say that she did not want to do another property tax increase, that some have said might be inevitable after, the one by her predecessor of $53 million, that hit property owners hard, with much was passed onto tenants.

Hitting the brakes hard on spending, maybe even harder, after a report, also released on Tuesday, from bond rating agency S&P Global Ratings, and was reported by Crain’s Chicago Business who said:

“In a statement, S&P Global Ratings says the city’s commitment to solving its pension woes, a commitment first made by former Mayor Rahm Emanuel, is "at the core" of the city’s current BBB+ rating—above junk, but only by two levels.

However, it notably added, “We would view any measure that would lower annual contributions into Chicago’s pension systems negatively.  That’s a reference to talk that Lightfoot might seek to lower and move farther into the future the pension-payment ramp adopted at Emanuel’s request.

On the other hand, the New York firm said, “We would view measures that either trim liabilities through benefit reductions or a dedicated revenue stream toward pensions positively.” S&P didn’t get specific, but officials have talked at reviving what now appear to be moribund plans for a Chicago casino that could help pay pension debt or moving to reduce the 3 percent annual compound COLA that about half of the city’s retirees now are scheduled to receive, perhaps by amending the Illinois Constitution.”

“Next year, the city must contribute an additional $121 million to its pension funds in order to keep them on the path to solvency. And the city’s required pension payments will have jumped by nearly $1 billion a year by 2024. It must also pay about $650 million in debt service. In recent years, the city has used borrowed money in order to help balance budgets and pay for short-term services,” reported local station WBEZ.
Lightfoot’s formal budget proposal will be released after she addresses the City Council on October 23rd.
Tied to the future, if not the near future, is her campaign promise to start investment in the areas that have been long neglected, and are tied to the increasing crime rate that has characterized the city as a war zone.

“Thus, our pathway to fiscal health has to run through households and neighborhoods like Roseland, and Rogers Park, Austin and Englewood, from the southeast and southwest, and neighborhoods like Pullman and Park Manor. We must lead with public investment, along with private partnerships, to catalyze neighborhoods where generational poverty has people in its crushing grip, “she emphasized.

In what some called a political speech, the new mayor also tackled one of the more divisive local issues that of the dividing line between I-80 and Chicago, and noted, “People in this state know – as I do – that I-80 is not a border - That there cannot be a “Chicago” versus “The Rest of the State.”

“All of Illinois is looking for solutions. And to really solve these problems, we all have to be partners in reform,” she noted, and this may be a nod to Governor J.B. Pritzker for targeted help joining pension funds in a statewide pool to limit the liability and increase resources, in a massed group, but one that Pritzker has demurred, yet as we have noted before, she is ready to do battle for the new graduated tax referendum he has placed on the referendum for the fall ballot.

“We have been, since the time of the transition, in conversation with the governor and his team, the legislative leaders and their respective teams,” Lightfoot said last week. “We need to have help from Springfield to address the challenges we have as a city. Now some people say well we can’t do a Chicago bailout but the reality is Chicago is 80 percent of the economy of this state.”

In the works is the casino project, but it may not be placed where she wants it, in neglected south, or west side neighborhoods. But, no matter, where it is located, the needed revenue is necessary to fill city coffers; yet there has been some debate over exactly how sweet the deal is for the operators, and, in turn, the city.

Reuters noted that “Legislation signed in June by Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker authorized a casino for Chicago as part of a state-wide gambling expansion that included sports betting.

But the analysis, conducted by Las Vegas-based consultant Union Gaming Analytics, said the law contained the highest effective gaming tax and fee structure in the United States, making it difficult to finance a Chicago casino and operate it at a profit.

Total development costs, including licensing and other fees, would generate “at best a 1% or 2% return annually, which is not an acceptable rate of return for a casino developer on a greenfield project,” according to the analysis, which looked at five proposed sites for the project.”

“If we don’t secure this casino and the revenue it generates, we will be forced to make painful choices on finding other revenue sources, and we all know what those are, the sources we wish to avoid,” Lightfoot said.

The allusion to a property tax increase as apparent, but the first move was the quick cue to the hiring freeze of “3,000 vacancies, including the Chicago Police Department. A September class of CPD recruits has been cancelled.”

The Chicago area is the nation’s third largest market behind Las Vegas and Atlantic City, New Jersey but the possibility of a deal that benefits all parties, is showing cracks.

“In late June, the CEO of Penn National Gaming, the state’s largest gambling operator, said a Chicago casino “would be a very difficult investment to make.” Other big casino companies have either expressed similar sentiments or not commented.” said Crain’s Chicago Business, in mid-August.

Somewhat cryptically, Lightfoot addressed the problem of congestion, which sent some to scratch their heads on what she might have meant, while some think that there might be HOV lanes,  or possibly a head tax, to discourage those that want to come downtown, and drive, instead of taking public transportation, might take the form of a commuter tax.

It’s not over, not by a long shot, and October is just around the corner.



.