Thursday, October 17, 2019

Game on! CTU strikes after refusing CPS offer

Dr. Jackson of CPS

The day has come, and the Chicago Teachers' Union announced that it could not accept the offer from Chicago Public Schools and Mayor Lori Lightfoot, and that the strike would begin as planned on Thursday, giving no solace to the mayor and School District Supervisor Janice Jackson, in what can only be called the very last thing wanted, this early into the former’s term in office, just over 140 days.

In anticipation of the strike, CPS and the mayor’s office announced that classes would be cancelled the day for the strike --- a move designed to help parents in child care, and to lessen the optics that the national media would pounce on in the nation’s third largest school system with over 300,000 students, and 24,000 teachers.

As in 2012, playing to school of public opinion, has mostly been in the union’s favor, with supporters expressing their engagement, before Thursday, and in a neat trick, Lightfoot has come out of this battle with her reputation largely intact, with only 12 percent blaming Lightfoot in a recent Chicago Sun Times/ABC Channel 7 poll.

This is in direct contrast with the last strike in 2012, where former Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who became the villain, in what was a teachers v. him battle where he wanted them to work longer hours without additional compensation.

Not all is fair in love and war, as the old adage states, and there were throngs of school teachers and staff, wearing red shirts near their schools, with signs that read, “Our Strike/Your Watch” - addressed directly to Lightfoot.

Ms. Weingarten
This is clearly a power play between a long underappreciated workforce, and a city divided by race and social class, where the differences are seen most starkly in education, right behind housing; and, unfortunately Lightfoot, being new, is the perfect scapegoat, in the war of words.

“We’re going to teach the new mayor a lesson,” says American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten adding fuel to the fire.

Since Chicago got “home rule” to govern its education, during the administration of Richard J. Daley, those lines became hardened, and despite the more liberal policies of his successors, and son, Richard M. Daley, prying loose the vice of discrimination became even more difficult in an education district that is mostly black and brown, and mostly, recently, funded solely by a real estate tax; so, it does not take a genius to figure out who was on the losing side, for so long.

Enter Lightfoot with her mandate of change, and who was not the favored candidate, the plot thickens, with the defeated candidate, Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle, still in power, in that office, and also the local head of the Democratic National Committee, and in a blue city, and in a blue state, that counts for a lot; and, it was no surprise to see the near tear--stained face of Preckwinkle during her concession speech. 

Recently she announced that had she been elected mayor, there would be no strike; which might have been true, but as one person later said, "She would have given a blank check to the CTU and bankrupted the city, and then we'd be like Detroit."

While the CTU has vigorously denied that their endorsement of Preckwinkle, and not Lightfoot, had anything to do with the increased, and loud demands, for written promises for more social workers, nurses, and libraries in a city mired in red ink, (to the tune of $838 million), and a pension crisis of  $28 billion, those numbers cannot be ignored, say its critics.

As we said before, “Adding to the ire between the two was a commissioned poll, from March, that showed a victory for Lightfoot, “to finish first among 14 candidates vying to replace” Emanuel, which CTU Vice President Stacy Davis Gates called “trash.”

“Sharp rhetoric is not unknown in Chicago politics, but this time, on the backdrop of a weakened city finances, with the historic election of a black woman, in a city with nearly a 35 percent black majority, adds another dimension to an already burdened financial future.”

Putting Lightfoot on the ropes, nationally, and to embarrass her, seems to be more important, say some than finding a middle ground, or even, going back to work while negotiating, but this seems to have been never considered, and as Lightfoot has often said, they were bound and determined to strike, in what seems more and more to the mayor's supporters, as a take-down of her, as Weingarten noted.

In the recent past, the Chicago Sun-Times and The Chicago Tribune urged the union to take the offer of a 16 percent pay raise, over 5 years, to no avail, bringing this stalemate, which teachers said that they hoped to be short, but is apparent, now that the union is prepared to keep it ongoing, and has sent key negotiators, from the 40 member team back to the picket line, as the news cameras roll.

CTU has also been somewhat disingenuous claiming, in a press release, that “CPS gets upwards of $1 billion additional dollars a year from the state of Illinois to lower class sizes, which are among the largest in the state; support students in poverty . . . and address CPS’ demonstrated need for wrap-around supports for students who confront trauma and violence. Yet CPS and the mayor have refused to commit to investing that billion dollars in real equity on the ground for school communities.”

“But, in fact, CTU’s own filings with the independent fact finder in the labor dispute  indicate that most of that $1 billion went to CTU members' pensions,” says Crain’s Chicago Business columnist Greg Hinz, who said that nearly three-quarters of that went to teachers’ pension plans, unmasking Lightfoot as the villain, they want her to be.
“Yes, according to CTU’s own filings, $380 million from a property tax increase and $211 million from the state went specifically to shore up the fiscally weak Chicago Teachers Pension Fund. And revenue from the property tax hike is expected to bring in almost an additional $100 million a year on top of the $380 million,” he continued.
While the mayor has said that she is “disappointed” - how to clear the decks without the money remains a conundrum for many city hall watchers. Of course, the mayor could as columnist John Kass suggested, slash her salary and compensation offer, and provide the money for the so-called wrap around services, but that Machiavellian move could cost her good will in any later negotiations; but it’s not entirely a pipe dream, say others.


Mayor Lightfoot
"From a financial standpoint, we always have to keep in mind the taxpayers. CPS is just on the other side of pretty significant crisis and we don't have unlimited resources, but having said that, we put very generous offers on the table both for teachers and support personnel and I'm hopeful that we'll be able to bring them back to the table and resolve all the other open issues."

The 1995 law that says that teachers can only strike on wages and compensation is a major sticking point, and maybe, Lightfoot will have to go Gov. J.B. Pritzker hat in hand, for another change, and an IOU?

“There’s a finite amount of money that’s available,” she said. “As you know, we’re barely two years away from a moment when CPS was on the verge of insolvency. There’s not an unlimited pool of money, and I wanted to make sure that we made that point very clear.”

The rhetoric has gone back and forth with Sharkey, being the loudest, saying, according to the local CBS station, "Criticized the city’s offer of $1 million over the life of the contract to reduce class sizes in grades 4-12, and $2 million over the life of the contract to recruit and train new nurses, social workers, and case managers. He said that would be only enough money for two teachers and four nurses, social workers, or case managers per year for all of CPS."

The visit of presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren has also given CTU more national attention, and while Warren did not attack Lightfoot, the implication that support was needed, or else, has contributed to the circus like atmosphere, surrounding the strike.

“I’m here because the eyes of this nation are upon you. They have turned to Chicago for you to lead the way. For you to show how the power of standing together is the power of making real change in this country,” Warren said.

She also gave her final benediction to the union's position, when she said: “Everyone in America should support you in this strike ... you don’t just fight for yourselves, you fight for the children of this city and the children of this country."

.Updated, 22 October, 2019, at 5:35 p.m. CSDT






No comments:

Post a Comment